Some Final Thoughts on World Cup

Photobucket
The FIFA World Cup came to a close on Sunday, July 11, with a deserving win by Spain over The Netherlands. The match was far from pretty, but people watched in large numbers, including here in the US. According to reports (http://bit.ly/aCZQvB), over 15.5 million people watched the final match on ABC, setting a record for US viewership, while another 8.8 million watched Spanish-language coverage on Univision. There is no doubt the numbers are impressive and had the US team not lost in its first elimination match against Ghana, who knows if that number could have gone even higher.

On the heels of World Cup came news of Thierry Henry, the French soccer superstar, signing with MLS’s New York Red Bulls. Without question, the news for soccer in the US has been pretty decent of late. So, it’s probably a good time to once again ask the question (paraphrased for timeliness) I posed several posts ago. What will the interest in World Cup and the signing of Henry mean to soccer in the US at the professional level?

In our post, FIFA World Cup: What will it mean for US Soccer?, we explained why we believe soccer will not elevate to anything approaching other US-based pro leagues in the foreseeable future. The Henry signing has a chance to make a dent though. My friend and soccer aficionado, Gordon Kane of Victory Sports Marketing, believes the Henry signing is more significant than when David Beckham signed with the LA Galaxy. He also believes that if rumors prove true and Brazil’s Ronaldinho signs with an MLS team, it would be even more significant. I agree that if Henry can show that he is not a star on the decline and his game is still at a world class level, it may begin to tip the scale. Ronaldinho, while a brilliant and exciting player, wasn’t even placed on Brazil’s World Cup team, so it’s hard to say his career isn’t at least trending down.

Super stardom in any sport helps drive interest. In soccer, stardom is harder to appreciate for the average American sports fan that doesn’t possess a long history with the beautiful game. We know Jimmie Johnson is a NASCAR star because he has won four straight Sprint Cups. LeBron’s stats and appearances on ESPN’s Top 10 plays – not to mention being able to hijack an hour of our time so he could let us in on a decision – indicate he’s something special. Argentina’s Lionel Messi, oft-cited as the world’s greatest contemporary player, was unable to find the back of the net during the World Cup. That doesn’t mean he isn’t a brilliant player, it is just hard for the not-yet-enlightened to grasp.

Increased buzz about soccer from a sports marketing perspective, however, is a positive as it opens up interest in understanding the demographics and psychographics of the fan base. Understanding which sports, entertainment property or events deliver what audiences is a critical part of a sponsorship marketer’s role. It is equally important to not misread the tea leaves. Interest in the BIG EVENT (e.g. World Cup and Olympics) may indicate latent interest in a sport/activity, but you cannot automatically make the leap that such interest will transfer over to following a league regularly simply because it’s on your home turf.

Adidas Over Nike in World Cup Showdown: We have praised the brilliant piece of advertising cinema Nike created in advance of World Cup entitled, “Write the Future.” Adidas’ advertising work this time was not as inspired as we’ve seen in the past. But, proving that sports marketing and advertising are not synonymous, DeepThoughts feels that the German apparel company’s more pervasive presence (including what they garnered from official status sponsorship with FIFA) and focus on broader “team support” was stronger than Nike’s effort to showcase super stars that under delivered on the main stage. And while the Cup’s winning goal came off the Nike-wearing foot of Andres Iniesta, his uniform, as well as the uniform of his Spanish team, was adidas. Oh, and remember the controversy over adidas’ Jubalani soccer ball? Well, it has been selling in record numbers.

dp

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Some Final Thoughts on World Cup”

  1. Vlad says:

    There are a couple of things I want to cover. First, the popularity of soccer in the U.S. Soccer in America will never be as popular as it is in the rest of the world. And it does not matter if Thierry Henry or David Beckham signs to play for the MLS. Beckham is not appreciated by fans here for his soccer skills, but more by how he looks, and how well you can market him. As far as Henry, he is a player who at one point was world class but is now on the decline. That is why he had to stick his hand out to score a goal so France could even qualify (sorry, that’s me bring frustrated with the situation). But he is none the less on the decline. Both of these players at one point were among the best in the game and Rohnaldinho was at one point regarded as the best footballer in the world. But none of these guys can have any sort of effect on the popularity of soccer in the U.S. The problem lies in the fact that, here we don’t have a sufficient enough structure to make soccer popular. We simply don’t have enough output of good American players. In Europe almost every kid grows up playing soccer just like our kids grow up playing baseball. If a 10 year old kid in Europe shows prospect of being any good, the teams recruit that kid and place them in their schools and development programs. Basically they tailor him every day to be a great soccer player. Our development programs are just not at that level. Second, we have no American soccer players that are popular enough to make an impact. The only time you hear about Landon Donovan is when the World Cup is around. If we can’t market the game, then how can anyone expect it to grow in popularity? If the MLS wants to grow in popularity, they need to start out from the bottom and make sure that kids are interested at a young age. Not bring in players from Europe that no one really knows, or really appreciates their abilities.

Leave a Reply